- New “Standard” Models Launched: Tesla rolled out lower-cost “Standard” versions of its popular Model Y SUV and Model 3 sedan, priced at $39,990 and $36,990 respectively [1]. These stripped-down models drop some premium features (like Autosteer, rear seat heaters, and other upgrades) but still offer over 300 miles (~516 km) of range on a smaller battery [2] [3]. CEO Elon Musk pitched them as “affordable” Teslas aimed at a broader market, noting “people don’t have enough money… so the more affordable we can make the car, the better” [4].
- Investors Unimpressed – Stock Slides: Markets reacted negatively to the modest price cuts. Tesla’s stock tumbled roughly 4–4.5% following the announcement [5] [6], erasing a big rally from earlier in the week. Even longtime Tesla bulls were disappointed – Wedbush analyst Dan Ives said he was “disappointed”the new variants are only about $5,000 cheaper than existing trims [7]. Traders effectively “bought the rumor, sold the news,” as shares gave back gains once the launch details came out [8].
- “Not Enough” to Boost Demand: Many analysts doubt the ~$40k price point will significantly expand Tesla’s customer base. One strategist quipped that this move is basically a “pricing lever and not much of a product catalyst,” unlikely to unlock substantial new demand [9]. Shay Boloor, chief strategist at Futurum Equities, noted the sub-$40k Model Y “undercuts the psychological $40k barrier” but mostly by enticing existing buyers to “trade down from the premium trims” rather than attracting truly new buyers [10]. Others argued Tesla “needs a sub-$30k EV” to compete long-term [11], warning the new Standard models “may not be enough” to counter rising competition, especially from cheaper Chinese electric cars [12] [13].
- Sales Surge Ends, Tax Credit Gone: Tesla had just reported record deliveries in Q3 2025 – about 497,000 vehicles, beating expectations as U.S. buyers rushed to beat a $7,500 EV tax credit that expired on Sept 30 [14]. But with that incentive gone, analysts expect a sales slump in Q4 unless the new lower-priced models can sustain demand [15] [16]. Some rival automakers preemptively cut EV prices or extended discounts to soften the blow of the tax credit’s end [17], heightening pressure on Tesla’s strategy.
- Competitive and Market Headwinds: Tesla’s move comes amid intensifying EV competition globally. In Europe – where Musk’s controversial politics have even eroded some brand loyalty – Tesla’s new offerings face over a dozen rival EVs under $30k from brands like VW, Hyundai, and Chinese newcomers [18]. Tesla’s market share in Europe has shrunk to ~1.5% after a 22.5% drop in Q3 deliveries there [19]. The company’s last major launch, the Cybertruck, saw only around 52,000 units sold since its 2023 debut (per Cox Automotive), underscoring Tesla’s challenge in expanding its lineup. All this raises the stakes on Musk’s promise to deliver truly mass-market EVs and maintain Tesla’s growth trajectory.
Tesla Debuts “Affordable” Models to Revive Sales
Tesla unveiled new budget-friendly trims of its two top-selling vehicles – the Model Y crossover and Model 3 sedan – in an effort to boost sagging sales. The announcement on October 7 introduced “Standard Range” versions of the Model Y (starting at $39,990) and Model 3 ($36,990) [20]. These prices are roughly 15% lower than Tesla’s previous base models, marking a significant adjustment aimed at a wider swath of buyers.
However, some immediately questioned just how “affordable” these Teslas really are. The new starting prices still hover closer to $40k than the sub-$30k level many consider true mass-market territory. In fact, the discounts amount to only about a $5,000 price cut versus the prior entry-level trims [21]. That led industry watchers to note the cars remain relatively expensive for cost-conscious consumers. “The starting prices…were too high, some said, to attract a new class of buyers,” Reuters reported bluntly [22].
To hit those lower price points, Tesla scaled back on features. Both Standard models use smaller battery packs (still good for an EPA-estimated 321 miles of range) and come with less powerful acceleration than the premium versions [23]. They also omit certain amenities: for example, these cheaper trims lack Tesla’s Autosteer driver-assist, have manual side mirrors, forego rear-seat touchscreens and heaters, and use cloth upholstery (with vegan leather optional on the Model 3) [24]. In short, Tesla trimmed some luxury and tech frills while keeping the core performance respectable to lower production costs.
Elon Musk’s rationale for this move is straightforward – he’s long argued that price is the biggest barrier preventing would-be buyers from going electric. “The desire to buy the car is very high; [it’s] just that people don’t have enough money… So the more affordable we can make the car, the better,” Musk said earlier this year [25]. By bringing the sticker price under $40,000, Tesla hopes to tempt budget-minded shoppers and bolster demand, especially as its older models face slowing sales. The timing isn’t coincidental: U.S. federal EV tax credits expired at the end of Q3 2025, which had artificially pulled forward many sales into the summer. Tesla is effectively trying to fill that incentive gap by making its cars cheaper up-front.
Notably, Musk canceled plans for an all-new $25,000 model last year (often dubbed the “Model 2” by fans) [26]. Instead, Tesla opted to repackage existing models in a lower-cost trim. This decision has pros and cons – it’s faster and less risky than developing a brand-new car, but it also “spark[ed] concerns…that the cheaper cars would cannibalize sales of existing vehicles and limit growth,” as Reuters first reported [27]. Essentially, Tesla is now selling a slightly downgraded Model Y/3 to hit a lower price bracket, rather than expanding its lineup. That conservative approach is drawing mixed reviews.
“Buy the Rumor, Sell the News”: Investor Reaction Sends Shares Lower
In the days before the unveiling, Tesla’s stock soared on anticipation – a classic case of “buy the rumor.” The company had teased a forthcoming product announcement, fueling a 5%+ rally in Tesla’s share price on Monday, Oct 6 [28]. The stock had been on a tear, hitting around $459 per share in early October after a two-week surge [29], and even notching a fresh 52-week high. Enthusiastic investors were betting that a new affordable Tesla could significantly expand the company’s market and boost growth.
But once the details dropped on Tuesday/Wednesday, the market mood flipped – “sell the news” kicked in. By the end of Oct 7, Tesla’s stock closed down about 4.5% for the day [30], a sharp reversal of the prior gains. (Shares fell roughly 3–4% in Tuesday’s session alone [31], and extended losses into Wednesday’s trading, according to multiple reports.) The price pullback left Tesla trading in the mid-$400s per share, off its recent highs.
What spooked investors was the realization that the “big announcement” was merely a mild price cut on existing cars – not a breakthrough new model or technology. “Markets weren’t impressed – Tesla stock fell ~4.5%, and even bullish analysts like Dan Ives called the price cuts too shallow,” noted TS², summarizing the Street’s reaction [32]. Indeed, Dan Ives, a well-known Tesla bull at Wedbush Securities, openly criticized the move as underwhelming, saying he was “disappointed the cars were only about $5,000 cheaper” than the prior trims [33]. In other words, Tesla didn’t go far enough in the eyes of many investors hoping for a game-changer.
Some traders also framed the stock drop as part of a broader market dynamic. After a huge year-to-date rally (Tesla’s stock had more than doubled in 2025), expectations were sky-high – perhaps unrealistically so. “Again for Tesla… it’s ‘buy on rumor, sell on news’,” observed Dennis Dick, a veteran trader, pointing out that this is the second time recentlyTesla’s stock has jumped on hype only to fall once reality set in [34]. He noted Tesla shares similarly sold off after the company’s strong September sales report, suggesting investors are quick to take profits unless news exceeds the already heavy expectations [35].
The modest scope of the “affordable” Model Y/3 reveal clearly did not clear that high bar. As a result, many shareholders locked in gains from the pre-event rally, sending the stock and Tesla’s $1.4+ trillion market cap lower. It’s a reminder that, for a richly valued company like Tesla, even seemingly positive developments can disappoint if they don’t fundamentally change the growth narrative. And Tesla’s valuation is rich – at over 240 times earnings (P/E ~243) recently [36], it prices in aggressive future growth. Any sign that Tesla is merely tweaking pricing, rather than unlocking new markets, can trigger a negative reaction on Wall Street.
Experts: Price Cuts “Not a Catalyst” – Tesla Needs a Truly Cheap EV
The consensus among many analysts and industry experts is that Tesla’s new price tweaks are a stopgap, not a revolution. While the lower-cost models should help at the margins, they likely won’t dramatically expand Tesla’s addressable market or solve its competitive challenges. As Shay Boloor, chief market strategist at Futurum Equities, put it: “It’s basically a pricing lever and not much of a product catalyst” [37]. In Boloor’s view, Tesla has played this card before – introducing a “Standard Range” trim to goose sales – and it typically “keep[s] the lineup fresh” but doesn’t create new demand so much as shuffle existing buyers around [38]. The risk is that many buyers of the Standard Model Y or 3 may simply be those who would have bought a higher trim but opt for the cheaper one, cannibalizing some sales of more expensive versions [39]. That helps volume numbers, but it can hurt profit margins without necessarily bringing in tons of first-time Tesla customers.
Others argue Tesla should have gone further to truly make an impact. “I just don’t know that this is enough,” said Shawn Campbell, an advisor at Camelthorn Investments, reacting to the ~$37–40k price tags [40]. Campbell and several of his peers were hoping for a Tesla in the low-$30,000s or even $25k range. Without that, Tesla still isn’t competing in the entry-level market where a huge pool of car buyers resides. “Longer term, this news doesn’t solve the problem posed by lower cost Chinese competitors in global markets. In my opinion, Tesla needs a sub-$30k EV,”Campbell warned bluntly [41]. This sentiment is widely shared – legacy automakers like GM, Ford, and Hyundai already offer (or plan) EVs around $30k or below, and Chinese brands are aggressively targeting the affordable segment [42]. Tesla’s decision to top out just under $40k leaves a lot of room for rivals to undercut them.
There’s also a sense that Tesla’s innovation engine has slowed while others catch up. “They are behaving like a classic car company using price elasticity to grab some short-term share,” observed Ken Johnston, a VP at consultancy Envorso, “but the real issue is that the company hasn’t delivered a truly new model since the Cybertruck” [43]. By relying on pricing tactics instead of groundbreaking new vehicles, Tesla runs “the risk of an innovation plateau,”Johnston and others say [44]. High-profile promised products like the next-gen Roadster and Robotaxi still remain concepts, not shipping vehicles [45]. This critique suggests that while Tesla focuses on AI and futuristic projects, its core car lineup has aged. The Model 3 is now 6+ years old; the Model Y is essentially a derivative of it. Aside from the niche Cybertruck, Tesla hasn’t introduced a new consumer model in several years.
To be fair, the Standard Model Y/3 strategy will likely provide a short-term sales boost. Some analysts note it should “help drive sales volumes”, especially in Q4 now that higher-priced trims lost their U.S. tax credit advantage [46]. “A cheaper Model Y and 3 will help… we have seen a recovery in unit sales,” Campbell acknowledged, predicting Tesla’s fourth-quarter sales will be fine in terms of year-over-year comparisons [47]. The price drop may entice a segment of buyers who were on the fence – those who just needed a few thousand dollars off to make a Tesla viable. Additionally, Seth Goldstein, a Morningstar analyst, said the sub-$40k price point “opens the Model 3 and Y up to more consumers” who couldn’t afford the higher trims, and will help Tesla “maintain deliveries momentum” into the end of the year despite losing the credit [48] [49].
Crucially, however, Goldstein and others frame these models as competing in the “higher-end affordable” tier – meaning upper-middle pricing, not true budget cars [50]. Tesla is targeting buyers who might otherwise consider a loaded Toyota Camry or entry-level luxury car, rather than the average economy car shopper. That still leaves Tesla absent from the sub-$30k market entirely, a void competitors are eager to fill. As Jacob Bourne of eMarketer noted, much of 2025’s EV sales surge came from expiring tax credits and aggressive discounts, and “a slowdown in demand is likely ahead” now that those boosts are gone [51]. Bourne suggests Tesla “shouldn’t give up on past promises” of a truly affordable model if it wants to broaden its base in a tougher market [52].
In sum, Wall Street’s verdict is that the new Standard Model Y and 3 are better than nothing, but not a game-changer. They buy Tesla some time and incremental volume, yet do not fundamentally alter the EV landscape or Tesla’s competitive positioning. The move feels defensive – a response to easing demand and rivals’ pricing pressure – rather than boldly offensive. “For the market, this is Tesla dropping its Steve Jobs turtleneck and slipping into a Walmart hoodie,” quipped Michael Ashley Schulman, CIO at Running Point [53]. “It’s no longer the cool rebel at the edge of innovation – it’s the establishment trying to play both Tesla and Toyota at once.” That colorful analogy captures the sentiment that Tesla is, at least for now, acting more like an incumbent automaker adjusting prices to chase sales, as opposed to the disruptive force it once was.
EV Market Headwinds: Competition, Credits, and Challenges Ahead
Tesla’s pricing move also highlights the headwinds and shifts in the EV market around the world. The company isn’t operating in a vacuum – rivals are nipping at its heels, and external factors like government incentives are in flux. A few key context points:
- End of U.S. Tax Credits: The timing of Tesla’s announcement came just after the $7,500 federal EV tax credit for its cars expired on Sept 30. This credit expiry had a huge effect: Tesla’s Q3 deliveries spiked to a record 497,099(nearly half a million) as Americans rushed to buy before losing the rebate [54]. In fact, Tesla beat analysts’ delivery forecasts largely thanks to that last-minute surge. But now the boost is over – any U.S. buyers who delayed purchasing will no longer get that subsidy. Analysts widely expect Tesla’s U.S. sales to soften in Q4 as a result [55]. The new cheaper models are Tesla’s attempt to “effectively extend the benefit” of the expired incentive by offering an equivalent price break [56]. Other automakers aren’t standing still either: some, like Ford and GM, cut EV prices when the credit ended, and others devised special discounts or financing to mimic the credit’s savings [57]. This suggests a looming price war in the EV space – great for consumers, but potentially rough on automakers’ margins.
- Intense Competition (U.S. and Europe): Tesla still leads in EV sales, but its dominance is eroding as competitors multiply. In Europe, Tesla’s deliveries plunged 22.5% in Q3 and its market share fell to a slender 1.5% [58]. The company is now one player among many in Europe, facing over a dozen EV or plug-in models priced below $30,000 from brands like Volkswagen, Renault, Hyundai/Kia, and several Chinese manufacturers [59]. Those cheaper European and Asian EVs are attracting exactly the cost-conscious buyers Tesla is missing. Additionally, Musk’s personal reputation may be weighing on Tesla’s brand in some markets – Reuters notes that in Europe, Musk’s polarizing political comments (often right-leaning) have “undermined brand loyalty” for Tesla among some consumers [60]. That creates an extra hurdle as Tesla tries to win over new buyers on the continent with an affordability pitch.In the U.S., Tesla’s main foes are the legacy automakers ramping up EV production (Ford’s Mustang Mach-E, Chevy’s upcoming Equinox EV, etc.), as well as upstarts like Rivian and Lucid at the high end – and notably a wave of Chinese EV makers eyeing the American market. Lower-cost Chinese competitors pose a particular long-term threat [61]. Brands like BYD, Nio, XPeng, and others are innovating quickly and often pricing aggressively in markets like China and Europe. If they enter the U.S. in the coming years (some are planning to), Tesla could suddenly face a flood of well-priced alternatives. Campbell’s warning that Tesla’s announcement “doesn’t solve the problem” of cheaper Chinese EVs underscores a strategic concern [62] – Tesla may need not just incremental price cuts, but a ground-up low-cost model, to maintain global leadership as the field gets crowded.
- Lineup and Product Strategy: The rollout of Standard Range models also puts a spotlight on Tesla’s product strategy going forward. Musk has hinted at future vehicles – a next-gen platform, a potential compact car, the Robotaxi – but timelines are unclear. In the meantime, Tesla’s product mix is heavily reliant on aging models (the S and X are more than a decade old designs; the 3 is from 2017; Y from 2020). The Cybertruck, Tesla’s first all-new vehicle in years, began limited deliveries in late 2023, but so far volumes have been modest (about 52,000 units sold through 2025, per estimates [63]) relative to the enormous preorder hype. Production challenges and niche appeal have tempered the Cybertruck’s impact – it’s not (yet) a mass-market game changer. This context explains why Tesla is squeezing more out of the 3 and Y – they are the workhorses that have to bridge the gap until something truly new arrives.Musk has recently re-focused Tesla’s long-term vision around AI and “Full Self-Driving” (FSD) technology, plus a bold gambit in humanoid robots. He’s even testing a robotaxi service in Texas on a pilot basis [64]. These initiatives aim to transform Tesla from just a carmaker into a tech platform company. However, those advances will take time to materialize as substantial revenue. In the near term, Tesla’s financial performance still depends on selling cars. As Schulman wryly noted, “the cars remain the cash engine; the real story for Tesla is still autonomy and robotics” in the future [65] – but for now, Tesla must compete on wheels, not just on chips. The Standard Model Y and 3 are an acknowledgment of that reality: a play to shore up vehicle sales while the company buys time for its next-generation innovations.
- Margin Pressure vs. Volume Growth: One clear trade-off here is profit margin. By cutting prices (or introducing lower-priced variants), Tesla could pressure its famously high automotive gross margins. The company has already engaged in multiple price cuts across 2023 to stimulate demand, which dented margins earlier in the year [66]. Musk has stated he’s willing to sacrifice margin for volume growth, betting on future software (FSD) revenue to make up the difference [67]. Investors are divided on this approach: Bulls believe Tesla’s scale and tech ecosystem will yield big profits down the road, while bears worry that undercutting pricing undermines the premium brand aura and could start a race to the bottom. With this latest move, Tesla is signaling it will aggressively defend its turf on pricing if needed. The big question is whether that will translate to sustained unit growth (making up in volume what it loses in margin), or whether it risks normalizing Tesla as just another car brand in a competitive marketplace.
Looking ahead, Tesla faces a delicate balancing act. It has to deliver nearly 390,000 vehicles in Q4 2025 to hit its full-year goal of 1.61 million [68] – a target that now looks challenging without the tailwind of U.S. credits. The new Standard models will contribute to Q4 sales once deliveries begin (Tesla’s website shows initial deliveries by December 2025 for many locations [69]), but it’s unclear how much pent-up demand exists for them. There’s likely a short-term backlog of orders from buyers who have been waiting for cheaper Teslas – Tesla opened orders immediately, and early indications suggest delivery wait times stretching into January for some markets [70]. That’s a positive sign. Still, sustaining demand into 2026 may require more: possibly further price adjustments or the introduction of that long-rumored truly low-cost model.
On the financial markets side, Tesla’s stock remains volatile but resilient. Even after this week’s dip, TSLA is up dramatically in 2025, reflecting optimism in Tesla’s long-term story (EV dominance, energy storage growth, AI ambitions, etc.). Yet, as the price/earnings ratio north of 240 shows, investors have already priced in a lot of that optimism [71]. Any stumble in execution – say, a drop in sales, delays in new products, or margin compression – can spark a sharp correction. This week’s reaction is a case in point: the launch wasn’t a failure per se, but it underwhelmed against high hopes, and the stock paid the price. Some analysts caution that Tesla’s valuation leaves “little room for error” [72]. The coming quarters will test whether Tesla can continue to grow into its valuation by expanding volume (helped by these Standard models) without severely undermining profitability or brand strength.
Outlook: Will Tesla’s Lower-Priced EVs Pay Off?
The introduction of the Model Y and 3 Standard editions marks a pivotal moment for Tesla. It signals that Tesla is serious about broader affordability, even if it hasn’t reached the truly mass-market price tier yet. In the near term, this move should goose sales and help Tesla navigate the post-tax-credit slump – insiders predict a decent fourth quarter as buyers respond to the new pricing [73]. The company’s decision to effectively create a “Tesla for the rest of us” (as some have dubbed it [74]) shows Musk’s recognition that market share and volume growth matter more now than pure prestige or high per-unit profit. This more pragmatic, volume-driven strategy is something legacy automakers know well, but for Tesla it’s somewhat new territory.
Whether it “backfires” or succeeds will depend on execution and the competitive response. If Standard Model Ys and 3s sell briskly and bring new customers into the Tesla ecosystem (who might later buy upgrades, subscribe to software features, etc.), it could be a smart bridge to the next phase of Tesla’s expansion. If instead it mostly convinces existing Tesla intenders to buy a slightly cheaper model, the net benefit could be minimal while sacrificing some margin. Tesla will be watching closely how many incremental orders these variants generate. Early feedback from analysts is cautious: they expect some boost in demand, but not a sea change unless prices eventually drop further [75] [76].
Critically, Tesla’s long-term growth still hinges on innovation – true innovation, not just pricing tweaks. The company has world-leading EV tech and brand cachet, but competitors are rapidly improving. To stay ahead, Tesla likely needs to launch new models in segments it doesn’t yet play in (smaller cars, perhaps a minivan or new crossover, etc.) and continue pushing the envelope on technology (FSD, batteries, manufacturing efficiency). Musk’s recent moves, like investing in AI and even personally buying up nearly $1 billion of Tesla stock [77], suggest he remains confident and is doubling down on Tesla’s future. The “affordable” Model Y and 3 are a step in that journey – not the final destination.
In the coming year, keep an eye on how Tesla adjusts. If sales start to flag or competition intensifies, Tesla could resort to deeper price cuts or promotions (something it historically avoided, but 2024–2025 may be a new era of price competition). Alternatively, Tesla might surprise with an accelerated timeline for a brand-new $25k model, which would likely be a true game-changer in the EV market if it materializes. For now, Tesla’s bet is that slightly cheaper versions of the Model Y and 3 will be enough to tide it over – boosting sales volume while the company works on the next big thing.
As one analyst aptly summarized, “Tesla’s decision to roll out lower-priced versions… is a step in the right direction, but it may not be enough given the current EV landscape” [78]. The electric vehicle race is only getting fiercer. Tesla has opened up its cars to more people with this move, but the company will need to keep innovating – and likely find a way to go even lower in price – to stay on top in a post-tax-credit, high-competition world. The stock market’s cold reception shows that merely meeting expectations isn’t enough for Tesla anymore; it has to continually defyexpectations to justify its hype. Time will tell if these new “Standard” models are a stepping stone to greater dominance or just a footnote in Tesla’s evolving story.
Sources:
- Reuters – Tesla debuts ‘affordable’ Model Y and 3 that strike some as too expensive [79] [80] [81]
- Reuters – Instant View: Reactions to Tesla’s launch of cheaper Model Y and Model 3 [82] [83]
- The Guardian (via Reuters) – Tesla debuts ‘affordable’ Model Y and 3 in US that strike some as too expensive [84] [85] [86]
- TS² – Tech’s Wild 48-Hour Ride (Oct 7–8, 2025) [87] [88]
- TS² – Tesla’s Meteoric Momentum: Why Oct. 2, 2025 Could Be a Game-Changer for TSLA [89] [90]
- Stock Market Today (TS²) – Wall Street Rally Stalls… [91] (market reaction)
- Financial Times – Tesla launches cheaper Model Y following end of US EV subsidies [92] (headline snippet)
- Additional context: Analyst and investor quotes from Reuters [93] [94]; U.S. EV credit expiry and sales data from Reuters/TS² [95] [96]; European market share from TS²/Reuters [97].
References
1. www.theguardian.com, 2. www.reuters.com, 3. www.reuters.com, 4. www.reuters.com, 5. ts2.tech, 6. www.theguardian.com, 7. www.theguardian.com, 8. www.reuters.com, 9. www.theguardian.com, 10. www.reuters.com, 11. www.theguardian.com, 12. www.theguardian.com, 13. www.reuters.com, 14. ts2.tech, 15. ts2.tech, 16. www.theguardian.com, 17. www.reuters.com, 18. www.theguardian.com, 19. ts2.tech, 20. www.theguardian.com, 21. www.theguardian.com, 22. www.theguardian.com, 23. www.reuters.com, 24. www.reuters.com, 25. www.reuters.com, 26. www.reuters.com, 27. www.reuters.com, 28. ts2.tech, 29. ts2.tech, 30. www.theguardian.com, 31. ts2.tech, 32. ts2.tech, 33. www.theguardian.com, 34. www.reuters.com, 35. www.reuters.com, 36. ts2.tech, 37. www.theguardian.com, 38. www.reuters.com, 39. www.reuters.com, 40. www.theguardian.com, 41. www.theguardian.com, 42. www.reuters.com, 43. www.reuters.com, 44. www.reuters.com, 45. www.reuters.com, 46. www.reuters.com, 47. www.reuters.com, 48. www.reuters.com, 49. www.reuters.com, 50. www.reuters.com, 51. www.reuters.com, 52. www.reuters.com, 53. www.reuters.com, 54. ts2.tech, 55. ts2.tech, 56. www.reuters.com, 57. www.reuters.com, 58. ts2.tech, 59. www.theguardian.com, 60. www.theguardian.com, 61. www.reuters.com, 62. www.theguardian.com, 63. 6do.world, 64. ts2.tech, 65. www.reuters.com, 66. ts2.tech, 67. ts2.tech, 68. ts2.tech, 69. www.reuters.com, 70. www.reuters.com, 71. ts2.tech, 72. ts2.tech, 73. www.reuters.com, 74. www.reuters.com, 75. ts2.tech, 76. www.theguardian.com, 77. www.theguardian.com, 78. www.reuters.com, 79. www.reuters.com, 80. www.reuters.com, 81. www.reuters.com, 82. www.reuters.com, 83. www.theguardian.com, 84. www.theguardian.com, 85. www.theguardian.com, 86. www.theguardian.com, 87. ts2.tech, 88. ts2.tech, 89. ts2.tech, 90. ts2.tech, 91. ts2.tech, 92. www.ft.com, 93. www.reuters.com, 94. www.reuters.com, 95. ts2.tech, 96. www.theguardian.com, 97. ts2.tech
